Residual moisture raises a handful of sensible questions. This page answers them in order, starting with the fundamentals and moving to applications.
This page was last updated on 2026-07-16 and is reviewed periodically as new material appears.
Lyophilization removes water by freezing a material and then lowering pressure so ice changes directly to vapor. The process relies on sublimation, the phase transition from solid to gas without an intermediate liquid state. Because the material remains frozen during primary drying, the structure often stays porous. This porous matrix can rehydrate quickly when water is added back. The low pressure also allows vapor to leave the solid matrix without boiling.
A typical cycle begins with freezing, which fixes the material into a solid and determines ice crystal size. Primary drying then raises heat under vacuum so ice sublimes, often near or below the collapse temperature of the formulation. Secondary drying removes bound water that remains after ice is gone, usually by gently warming the product. Each stage balances heat input against pressure to avoid melting or structural damage. Temperature probes and pressure sensors guide the transition between stages.
Quality control for lyophilized materials includes visual inspection, residual moisture measurement, and reconstitution testing. Cake appearance can reveal process problems such as collapse, shrinkage, or meltback, although appearance alone does not prove potency. Residual moisture is commonly measured by Karl Fischer titration or by loss on drying. Reconstitution time is checked because a slow or incomplete dissolve can indicate a change in pore structure. Stability studies track these attributes over time under defined temperature and humidity conditions.
Analytical methods for lyophilized solids must account for the low moisture content and the fragile cake. Karl Fischer titration is widely used for water content, while near-infrared spectroscopy can measure moisture non-destructively in sealed containers. X-ray diffraction and modulated differential scanning calorimetry help identify crystalline or amorphous phases. Residual solvent analysis may be needed if organic solvents were used during formulation. The combination of these methods supports batch release and long-term stability assessment.
| Property | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Common synonym | Freeze-drying | Same dehydration operation |
| Typical vacuum | 10-100 Pa | Pressure during primary drying |
| Primary drying temperature | -40 to -10 °C | Below collapse temperature for many formulations |
| Cycle duration | 12-72 hours | Varies with load, container, and formulation |
| Key phase change | Sublimation | Solid ice to water vapor |
Freeze-drying is distinct from simple evaporation and from spray drying. Evaporation removes water at temperatures above freezing, while spray drying rapidly dries droplets in a heated gas stream. Lyophilization avoids high temperatures, which can be useful for heat-sensitive materials such as proteins, vaccines, and some foods. The porous cake produced by sublimation dissolves or rehydrates more quickly than a dense dried mass. Not all materials tolerate freezing or the pH shifts that can occur as solutes concentrate during ice formation.
Lyophilization removes water from a frozen material by sublimation under reduced pressure. The process begins with freezing, which converts liquid water into ice and fixes the structure of the sample. After freezing, primary drying lowers pressure so ice changes directly to vapor without passing through a liquid phase. Secondary drying then removes bound water that remains after ice sublimation. The result is a dry, porous solid that often retains its original shape.
The low pressure used during drying allows water vapor to move from the ice surface to a cold condenser. Energy supplied as heat drives sublimation but must stay below the collapse temperature of the frozen matrix. If the product becomes too warm, the frozen structure may soften or melt, reducing pore formation and slowing drying. Formulations often include bulking agents, stabilizers, or buffers to support a rigid cake. The final moisture content depends on formulation, freezing rate, and the length of secondary drying.
Storage stability depends on water content, oxygen exposure, and temperature. Lyophilized solids are hygroscopic and can absorb water if exposed to humid air. Vials are usually sealed under vacuum or inert gas with rubber stoppers and aluminum crimps. Storage temperatures range from room temperature to refrigerated or frozen conditions depending on the material. Stability studies track potency, moisture, and physical form over time. Accelerated conditions can reveal sensitivity but may not predict long-term behavior.
Analytical methods for lyophilized materials include X-ray diffraction for crystallinity, differential scanning calorimetry for thermal transitions, and scanning electron microscopy for pore morphology. Moisture sorption analysis shows how the cake responds to humidity. These methods help distinguish amorphous from crystalline states and detect phase changes. Open questions remain about how pore structure changes during long-term storage and how best to predict collapse under varied conditions. Comparisons across studies are complicated by differences in formulation, cycle, and storage history.
EC 1.14.14.5: alkanesulfonate monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.6: Now EC 1.14.13.111, methanesulfonate monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.7: transferred to EC 1.14.19.9, tryptophan 7-halogenase EC 1.14.14.8: anthranilate 3-monooxygenase (FAD) EC 1.14.14.9: 4-hydroxyphenylacetate 3-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.10: nitrilotriacetate monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.11: styrene monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.12: 3-hydroxy-9,10-secoandrosta-1,3,5(10)-triene-9,17-dione monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.13: 4-(γ-L-glutamylamino)butanoyl-[BtrI acyl-carrier protein] monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.14: aromatase EC 1.14.14.15: (3S)-3-amino-3-(3-chloro-4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoyl-[peptidyl-carrier protein SgcC2] monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.16: steroid 21-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.17: squalene monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.18: heme oxygenase (biliverdin-producing) EC 1.14.14.19: steroid 17α-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.20: phenol 2-monooxygenase (FADH2) EC 1.14.14.21: dibenzothiophene monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.22: dibenzothiophene sulfone monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.23: cholesterol 7α-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.24: vitamin D 25-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.25: cholesterol 24-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.26: 24-hydroxycholesterol 7α-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.27: resorcinol 4-hydroxylase (FADH2) EC 1.14.14.28: long-chain alkane monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.29: 25/26-hydroxycholesterol 7α-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.30: isobutylamine N-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.31: ipsdienol synthase EC 1.14.14.32: 17α-hydroxyprogesterone deacetylase EC 1.14.14.33: ethylenediaminetetraacetate monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.34: methanesulfonate monooxygenase (FMNH2) EC 1.14.14.35: dimethylsulfone monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.36: tyrosine N-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.37: 4-hydroxyphenylacetaldehyde oxime monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.38: valine N-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.39: isoleucine N-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.40: phenylalanine N-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.41: (E)-2-methylbutanal oxime monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.42: homomethionine N-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.43: (methylsulfanyl)alkanaldoxime N-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.44: phenylacetaldehyde oxime monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.45: aromatic aldoxime N-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.46: pimeloyl-[acyl-carrier protein] synthase EC 1.14.14.47: nitric-oxide synthase (flavodoxin) EC 1.14.14.48: jasmonoyl-L-amino acid 12-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.49: 12-hydroxyjasmonoyl-L-amino acid 12-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.50: tabersonine 3-oxygenase EC 1.14.14.51: (S)-limonene 6-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.52: (S)-limonene 7-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.53: (R)-limonene 6-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.54: phenylacetate 2-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.55: quinine 3-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.56: 1,8-cineole 2-exo-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.57: taurochenodeoxycholate 6α-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.58: trimethyltridecatetraene synthase EC 1.14.14.59: dimethylnonatriene synthase EC 1.14.14.60: ferruginol monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.61: carnosic acid synthase EC 1.14.14.62: salviol synthase EC 1.14.14.63: β-amyrin 16β-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.64: β-amyrin 6β-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.65: sugiol synthase EC 1.14.14.66: marmesin synthase EC 1.14.14.67: 11-hydroxysugiol 20-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.68: syn-pimaradiene 3-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.69: ent-cassadiene hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.70: ent-sandaracopimaradiene 3-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.71: cucurbitadienol 11-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.72: drimenol monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.73: albendazole monooxygenase (sulfoxide-forming) EC 1.14.14.74: albendazole monooxygenase (hydroxylating) EC 1.14.14.75: fenbendazole monooxygenase (4′-hydroxylating) EC 1.14.14.76: ent-isokaurene C2/C3-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.77: phenylacetonitrile α-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.78: phylloquinone ω-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.79: docosahexaenoic acid ω-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.80: long-chain fatty acid ω-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.81: flavanoid 3′,5′-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.82: flavonoid 3′-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.83: geraniol 8-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.84: linalool 8-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.85: 7-deoxyloganate 7-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.86: ent-kaurene monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.87: 2-hydroxyisoflavanone synthase EC 1.14.14.88: isoflavone 3′-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.89: 4′-methoxyisoflavone 2′-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.90: isoflavone 2′-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.91: trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.92: benzoate 4-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.93: 3,9-dihydroxypterocarpan 6a-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.94: leukotriene-B4 20-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.95: germacrene A hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.96: 5-O-(4-coumaroyl)-D-quinate 3′-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.97: methyltetrahydroprotoberberine 14-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.98: protopine 6-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.99: (S)-limonene 3-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.100: dihydrosanguinarine 10-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.101: dihydrochelirubine 12-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.102: N-methylcoclaurine 3′-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.103: tabersonine 16-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.104: vinorine hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.105: taxane 10β-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.106: taxane 13α-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.107: ent-kaurenoic acid monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.108: 2,5-diketocamphane 1,2-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.109: 3-hydroxyindolin-2-one monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.110: 2-hydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.111: 9β-pimara-7,15-diene oxidase EC 1.14.14.112: ent-cassa-12,15-diene 11-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.113: α-humulene 10-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.114: amorpha-4,11-diene 12-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.115: 11-oxo-β-amyrin 30-oxidase EC 1.14.14.116: averantin hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.117: aflatoxin B synthase EC 1.14.14.118: tryprostatin B 6-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.119: fumitremorgin C monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.120: dammarenediol 12-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.121: protopanaxadiol 6-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.122: oryzalexin E synthase EC 1.14.14.123: oryzalexin D synthase EC 1.14.14.124: dihydromonacolin L hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.125: monacolin L hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.126: β-amyrin 28-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.127: methyl farnesoate epoxidase EC 1.14.14.128: farnesoate epoxidase EC 1.14.14.129: long-chain acyl-CoA ω-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.130: laurate 7-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.131: bursehernin 5′-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.132: (–)-4′-demethyl-deoxypodophyllotoxin 4-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.133: 1,8-cineole 2-endo-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.134: β-amyrin 24-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.135: glyceollin synthase EC 1.14.14.136: deoxysarpagine hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.137: (+)-abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.138: lithocholate 6β-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.139: 5β-cholestane-3α,7α-diol 12α-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.140: Now included with EC 1.14.14.162 EC 1.14.14.162, flavanone 2-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.141: psoralen synthase EC 1.14.14.142: 8-dimethylallylnaringenin 2′-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.143: (+)-menthofuran synthase EC 1.14.14.144: abieta-7,13-diene hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.145: abieta-7,13-dien-18-ol hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.146: geranylgeraniol 18-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.147: 3-epi-6-deoxocathasterone 23-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.148: angelicin synthase EC 1.14.14.149: 5-epiaristolochene 1,3-dihydroxylase EC 1.14.14.150: costunolide synthase EC 1.14.14.151: premnaspirodiene oxygenase EC 1.14.14.152: β-amyrin 11-oxidase EC 1.14.14.153: indole-2-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.154: sterol 14α-demethylase EC 1.14.14.155: 3,6-diketocamphane 1,2-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.156: tryptophan N-monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.157: indolin-2-one monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.158: carotenoid ε hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.159: dolabradiene monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.160: zealexin A1 synthase EC 1.14.14.161: nepetalactol monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.162: flavanone 2-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.163: (S)-1-hydroxy-N-methylcanadine 13-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.164: fraxetin 5-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.165: indole-3-carbonyl nitrile 4-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.166: (S)-N-methylcanadine 1-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.167: (13S,14R)-13-O-acetyl-1-hydroxy-N-methylcanadine 8-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.168: germacrene A acid 8β-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.169: eupatolide synthase EC 1.14.14.170: 8-epi-inunolide synthase EC 1.14.14.171: β-amyrin 16α-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.172: 3,5,6-trichloropyridin-2-ol monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.173: 2,4,6-trichlorophenol monooxygenase EC 1.14.14.174: geranylhydroquinone 3′′-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.175: ferruginol synthase EC 1.14.14.176: taxadiene 5α-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.177: ultra-long-chain fatty acid ω-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.182: taxoid 7beta-hydroxylase EC 1.14.14.197: progesterone 11alpha-monooxygenase
The public consortium also bought one of the PE Biosystems 3700 sequencers, and had plans to buy 200 more. The machine proved to be so fast that by late March 1999 the consortium announced that it had revised its timeline, and would release by the Spring of 2000 a "first draft sequence" for 80% of the human genome. At year end 1998, the PE Biosystems Group's sales reached US$940 million.
Apart from the long history, cod differ from most fish because the fishing grounds are far from population centres. The large cod fisheries along the coast of North Norway (and in particular close to the Lofoten islands) have been developed almost uniquely for export, depending on sea transport of stockfish over large distances. Since the introduction of salt, dried and salted cod (clipfish or 'klippfisk' in Norwegian) has also been exported. By the end of the 14th century, the Hanseatic League dominated trade operations and sea transport, with Bergen as the most important port. William Pitt the Elder, criticizing the Treaty of Paris in Parliament, claimed cod was "British gold"; and that it was folly to restore Newfoundland fishing rights to the French. In the 17th and 18th centuries in the New World, especially in Massachusetts and Newfoundland, cod became a major commodity, creating trade networks and cross-cultural exchanges. In 1733, Britain tried to gain control over trade between New England and the British Caribbean by imposing the Molasses Act, which they believed would eliminate the trade by making it unprofitable. The cod trade grew instead, because the "French were eager to work with the New Englanders in a lucrative contraband arrangement". In addition to increasing trade, the New England settlers organized into a "codfish aristocracy". The colonists rose up against Britain's "tariff on an import". In the 20th century, Iceland re-emerged as a fishing power and entered the Cod Wars.
=== Origins === LLNL was established in 1952, as the University of California Radiation Laboratory, Livermore Branch, an offshoot of the existing University of California Radiation Laboratory at Berkeley. The lab at Livermore was intended to spur innovation and provide competition to the nuclear weapon design laboratory at Los Alamos in New Mexico, home of the Manhattan Project that developed the first atomic weapons. The Livermore facility was co-founded by Edward Teller and Ernest Lawrence, director of the Radiation Laboratory at Berkeley. The new laboratory was sited at a former naval air station from World War II. It was already home to several University of California Radiation Laboratory projects that were too large for its location in the Berkeley Hills above the UC campus, including one of the first experiments in the magnetic approach to confined thermonuclear reactions (i.e. fusion). About half an hour southeast of Berkeley, the Livermore site provided much greater security for classified projects than an urban university campus. Lawrence tapped his former graduate student Herbert York, age 32, to run Livermore. Under York, the Lab had four main programs: Project Sherwood (the magnetic-fusion program), Project Whitney (the weapons-design program), diagnostic weapon experiments (both for the Los Alamos and Livermore laboratories), and a basic physics program. York and the new lab embraced the Lawrence "big science" approach, tackling challenging projects with physicists, chemists, engineers, and computational scientists working together in multidisciplinary teams.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Valence 3 is dominant in all subsequent elements up to lawrencium (with the exception of nobelium). Curium can be tetravalent in solids (fluoride, dioxide). Berkelium, along with a valence of +3, also shows the valence of +4, more stable than that of curium; the valence 4 is observed in solid fluoride and dioxide. The stability of Bk4+ in aqueous solution is close to that of Ce4+. Only valence 3 was observed for californium, einsteinium and fermium. The divalent state is proven for mendelevium and nobelium, and in nobelium it is more stable than the trivalent state. Lawrencium shows valence 3 both in solutions and solids. The redox potential
== External links == Clinical trial number NCT02715258 for "Safety and Efficacy of Bexagliflozin as Monotherapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes" at ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial number NCT03259789 for "Safety and Efficacy of Bexagliflozin Compared to Placebo as Add-on Therapy to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects" at ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial number NCT02769481 for "Safety and Efficacy of Bexagliflozin Compared to Glimepiride as Add-on Therapy to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects" at ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial number NCT03115112 for "Safety and Efficacy of Bexagliflozin Compared to Sitagliptin as Add-on Therapy to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Subjects" at ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial number NCT02836873 for "Safety and Efficacy of Bexagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With Moderate Renal Impairment" at ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical trial number NCT02558296 for "Bexagliflozin Efficacy and Safety Trial (BEST)" at ClinicalTrials.gov
Protein-containing supplements, either ready-to-drink or as powders to be mixed into water, are marketed as aids to people recovering from illness or injury, those hoping to thwart the sarcopenia of old age, to athletes who believe that strenuous physical activity increases protein requirements, to people hoping to lose weight while minimizing muscle loss, i.e., conducting a protein-sparing modified fast, and to people who want to increase muscle size for performance and appearance. Whey protein is a popular ingredient, but products may also incorporate casein, soy, pea, hemp or rice protein. A meta-analysis found a moderate degree of evidence in favor of whey protein supplements use as a safe and effective adjunct to an athlete's training and recovery, including benefits for endurance, average power, muscle mass, and reduced perceived exercise intensity. According to US and Canadian Dietary Reference Intake guidelines, the protein Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for adults is based on 0.8 grams protein per kilogram body weight. The recommendation is for sedentary and lightly active people. Scientific reviews can conclude that a high protein diet, when combined with exercise, will increase muscle mass and strength, or conclude the opposite. The International Olympic Committee recommends protein intake targets for both strength and endurance athletes at about 1.2–1.8 g/kg body mass per day. One review proposed a maximum daily protein intake of approximately 25% of energy requirements, i.e., approximately 2.0 to 2.5 g/kg.
==== Agitation ==== Ketamine is used to treat acute agitation, aggression, and excited delirium in pre-hospital and emergency settings, including symptoms refractory to other drugs such as antipsychotics and benzodiazepines.
Changes in nearby tissue is not the only possible impact of ligand therapy, there may be immunologic responses from the target tissue that cause changes remotely. This has been dubbed the "abscopal effect". While this mechanism is not well understood, it explains the impact of other tissue, both benign and malignant, after targeted radiotherapy.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Primary drying removes ice by sublimation under vacuum. Secondary drying removes water that is bound to the material, often by warming the product after most ice has left. Both stages occur below temperatures that would cause unwanted melting.
Sublimation requires the solvent to remain solid so vapor leaves without passing through a liquid phase. If the product melts, the porous structure can collapse and drying becomes uneven. Maintaining frozen conditions preserves the intended physical form.
No, freeze-drying is a dehydration method, not a sterilization step. It can reduce water activity and limit microbial growth during storage, but it does not reliably kill microbes or remove endotoxins. Sterility must come from separate validated processes.
Most lyophilized products are stored in sealed containers at controlled temperature and humidity. Some require refrigeration, while others are stable at room temperature. Protection from light and moisture is often necessary.